SKYY vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKYY returned 5.69%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SKYY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

SKYY vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYY achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.79% return.

SKYY

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: 16.26%

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYY vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund	3.03%	9.20%	35.87%	52.18%	-44.68%	10.62%	57.77%	2.85%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYY and FNGS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.80

The correlation between SKYY and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SKYY vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SKYY	FNGS
Technology	88.9%	59.9%
Communication Services	4.8%	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	11.3%
Healthcare	1.6%	-
Industrials	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SKYY vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYY

SKYY Risk / Return Rank: 17
SKYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SKYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SKYY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SKYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SKYY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYY vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SKYY	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	0.79	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.19	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.15	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.75	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	2.12	-0.99

SKYY vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYY Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYY and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SKYY vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYY drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYY and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKYY	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.20%	-48.98%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.39%	-22.93%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.80%	-26.77%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.20%	-48.98%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.63%	-9.63%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-10.85%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.34%	8.05%	+4.29%

Volatility

SKYY vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that SKYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKYY	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.09%	8.74%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.88%	17.19%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.45%	21.65%	+6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.67%	30.10%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.90%	31.17%	-4.27%

SKYY vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKYY vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SKYY nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.23%	0.78%	0.17%	0.54%	0.37%	0.27%	0.35%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKYY and FNGS in my portfolio?

SKYY and FNGS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKYY or FNGS?

SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYY dropped -53.20% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, SKYY or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 5.69% for SKYY. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SKYY or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SKYY or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SKYY or FNGS?

SKYY and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SKYY and FNGS?

SKYY is categorized as Technology Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SKYY and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.