SKYU vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SKYU is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, SKYU returned 41.23% vs 5016.23% for MULL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

SKYU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.

SKYU

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 27.03%
• YTD: 20.72%
• 6M: 18.01%
• 1Y: 41.23%
• 3Y*: 38.09%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -15.62%
• 1M: 119.20%
• YTD: 774.91%
• 6M: 1,229.17%
• 1Y: 5,016.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF	20.72%	2.76%	-1.94%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	774.91%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYU and MULL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.43

The correlation between SKYU and MULL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SKYU vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SKYU	MULL
Technology	51.5%	66.7%
Communication Services	4.7%	-
Industrials	2.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SKYU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYU

SKYU Risk / Return Rank: 22
SKYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SKYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
SKYU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SKYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SKYU Martin Ratio Rank: 18

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SKYU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	38.21	-37.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	6.62	-5.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.83	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	96.00	-95.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	321.55	-319.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SKYU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 38.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYU and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKYU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	38.21	-37.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	6.53	-6.50

Drawdowns

SKYU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKYU	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.01%	-72.29%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.23%	-53.09%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.26%	-15.62%	-6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.16%	-20.61%	-28.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.88%	15.82%	+8.06%

Volatility

SKYU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) is 22.68%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 57.59%. This indicates that SKYU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKYU	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.68%	57.59%	-34.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.60%	107.25%	-60.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.92%	133.41%	-77.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.88%	136.72%	-74.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.12%	136.72%	-75.60%

SKYU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKYU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF	0.58%	0.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKYU and MULL in my portfolio?

SKYU and MULL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKYU or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (57.59%) compared to SKYU (22.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, SKYU or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 5016.23% vs 41.23% for SKYU. On fees, SKYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SKYU has been the lower-risk option at 22.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SKYU or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 5016.23% return vs 41.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SKYU or MULL?

SKYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SKYU or MULL?

SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between SKYU and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (38.21 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.