SKYU vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. SKYU is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, SKYU returned 11.26% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

SKYU vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

SKYU

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -7.11%
• YTD: -8.42%
• 6M: -12.91%
• 1Y: 11.26%
• 3Y*: 27.77%
• 5Y*: -5.49%
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYU vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF	-8.42%	2.76%	65.79%	36.91%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYU and BAMU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.00

Return for Risk

SKYU vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYU

SKYU Risk / Return Rank: 12
SKYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SKYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SKYU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SKYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SKYU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYU vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SKYU	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	5.01	-4.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	8.84	-8.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	2.43	-1.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	24.72	-24.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.46	97.90	-97.43

SKYU vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYU and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SKYU vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKYU	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.01%	-0.36%	-82.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.23%	-0.12%	-50.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.03%	0.00%	-41.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.01%	-0.02%	-48.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.45%	0.03%	+24.42%

Volatility

SKYU vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 26.72% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKYU	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.72%	0.09%	+26.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.31%	0.40%	+47.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.53%	0.58%	+56.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.17%	0.87%	+61.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.16%	0.87%	+60.29%

SKYU vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKYU vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF	0.76%	0.56%	0.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKYU and BAMU in my portfolio?

SKYU and BAMU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKYU or BAMU?

SKYU has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, SKYU or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, SKYU leads with 11.26% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, SKYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SKYU or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, SKYU has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SKYU or BAMU?

SKYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SKYU or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.76% for SKYU.

What is the main difference between SKYU and BAMU?

SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.