SKOR vs. TDTT
SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) and TDTT (FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while TDTT is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKOR returned 2.88%/yr vs 3.10%/yr for TDTT. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SKOR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TDTT.
Performance
SKOR vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than TDTT's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SKOR has underperformed TDTT with an annualized return of 2.88%, while TDTT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.10% annualized return.
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
TDTT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
SKOR vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.45% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.76% | 6.67% | 3.96% | 4.40% | -4.58% | 5.49% | 6.84% | 5.74% | 0.25% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and TDTT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SKOR and TDTT shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
TDTT
SKOR vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKOR | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.93 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 16.04 | -7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKOR | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.43 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.92 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.69 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and TDTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -6.97% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -0.90% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.11% | -1.53% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -6.97% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | -6.97% | -9.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.18% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -1.60% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.28% | +0.30% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) at 0.45%. This indicates that SKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.45% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 1.21% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 1.84% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 3.67% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 3.38% | +1.52% |
SKOR vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than TDTT's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SKOR vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than TDTT's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.66% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.55% | 4.52% | 4.01% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKOR and TDTT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKOR has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to TDTT (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs TDTT's -6.97%.
On 10-year performance, TDTT leads with 3.10% vs 2.88% for SKOR. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTT has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 3.10% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SKOR.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.55% for TDTT.
SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TDTT is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.18% for TDTT.
TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKOR and TDTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer