PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKOR vs. IGSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKOR vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than IGSB's 0.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SKOR having a 2.82% annualized return and IGSB not far behind at 2.71%.


SKOR

1D
0.09%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
2.82%

IGSB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKOR vs. IGSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.45%7.99%4.42%7.64%-9.88%-1.40%8.84%10.69%-1.25%4.38%
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.75%6.96%4.97%6.40%-5.63%-0.56%5.37%7.11%1.25%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SKOR and IGSB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.73

Over the past year, SKOR and IGSB have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.73, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKOR vs. IGSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKOR vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKORIGSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.82

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

11.30

-3.79

SKOR vs. IGSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the IGSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKOR and IGSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than IGSB's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and IGSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKORIGSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-13.38%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-1.46%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-1.46%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-9.46%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

-13.38%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.28%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-0.85%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.36%

+0.25%

Volatility

SKOR vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.69%. This indicates that SKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKORIGSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.69%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

1.50%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

1.95%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

2.94%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

3.47%

+1.43%

SKOR vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IGSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SKOR vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison

SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than IGSB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SKOR and IGSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SKOR has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to IGSB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs IGSB's -13.38%.

On 10-year performance, SKOR leads with 2.82% vs 2.71% for IGSB. On fees, IGSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IGSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SKOR has performed better with a 2.82% return vs 2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SKOR.

SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.58% for IGSB.

SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while IGSB tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.04% for IGSB.

IGSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKOR and IGSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer