PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKIRX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SKIRX having a 9.24% return and FYHTX slightly lower at 9.22%.


SKIRX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-8.85%
YTD
9.24%
6M
7.97%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
4.40%

FYHTX

1D
-1.72%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
9.22%
6M
7.70%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SKIRX
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
9.24%11.95%2.64%-5.17%8.33%30.40%-1.68%2.72%-11.57%6.40%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
9.22%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SKIRX and FYHTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017

0.90

The correlation between SKIRX and FYHTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKIRX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKIRX
SKIRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SKIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SKIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKIRXFYHTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

6.25

-1.10

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKIRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKIRX and FYHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKIRX drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKIRX and FYHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKIRXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.19%

-33.22%

-54.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-12.55%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.82%

-12.55%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-25.47%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.97%

-12.55%

-62.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-11.91%

-55.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.00%

+0.11%

Volatility

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKIRXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.47%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

11.87%

+3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

14.12%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.37%

15.83%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

14.47%

-1.15%

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKIRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKIRX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

SKIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than FYHTX's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.68%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%0.00%0.00%
SKIRX
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
6.55%5.39%3.03%1.93%50.74%43.89%1.53%1.74%12.16%0.41%7.04%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKIRX and FYHTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKIRX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FYHTX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKIRX dropped -88.19% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.

FYHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKIRX and FYHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer