SKIRX vs. SCGSX
SKIRX (DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and SCGSX (DWS Capital Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SKIRX is a Commodities fund managed by DWS, while SCGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX returned 4.45%/yr vs 15.92%/yr for SCGSX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKIRX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SCGSX.
Performance
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKIRX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCGSX's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX has underperformed SCGSX with an annualized return of 4.45%, while SCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.
SKIRX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
SCGSX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.92%
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.85% | 11.95% | 2.64% | -5.17% | 8.33% | 30.40% | -1.68% | 2.72% | -11.57% | 1.54% |
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund | 4.40% | 12.34% | 26.27% | 38.61% | -30.88% | 22.41% | 38.60% | 36.98% | -1.96% | 26.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKIRX and SCGSX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2005 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SKIRX and SCGSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKIRX vs. SCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
SKIRX
SCGSX
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKIRX | SCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.81 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 2.58 | +2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKIRX drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, which is greater than SCGSX's maximum drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKIRX and SCGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKIRX | SCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.19% | -50.63% | -37.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -18.09% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.83% | -21.75% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | -35.81% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.33% | -35.81% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.15% | -3.25% | -70.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -12.78% | -55.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 5.66% | -2.44% |
Volatility
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) is 3.37%, while DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that SKIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKIRX | SCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 7.22% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 13.74% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 16.80% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 20.99% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 20.58% | -7.26% |
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKIRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCGSX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKIRX vs. SCGSX - Dividend Comparison
SKIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than SCGSX's 7.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund | 7.30% | 7.62% | 9.06% | 7.18% | 7.81% | 6.64% | 5.59% | 5.98% | 17.00% | 9.08% | 8.49% | 11.02% |
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 5.88% | 5.39% | 3.03% | 1.93% | 50.74% | 43.89% | 1.53% | 1.74% | 12.16% | 0.41% | 7.04% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKIRX and SCGSX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCGSX has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to SKIRX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKIRX dropped -88.19% vs SCGSX's -50.63%.
SKIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKIRX and SCGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer