FYHTX vs. GCCIX
FYHTX (Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund) and GCCIX (Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, FYHTX returned 9.34%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for GCCIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYHTX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GCCIX.
Performance
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 11.94% return.
FYHTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GCCIX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 13.20% | 14.72% | 4.73% | -8.62% | 15.32% | 26.43% | -3.84% | 6.91% | -11.71% | 6.00% |
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 11.94% | 15.45% | 5.92% | -9.65% | 15.70% | 33.42% | -23.01% | 16.75% | -14.89% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYHTX and GCCIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FYHTX and GCCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYHTX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank
FYHTX
GCCIX
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYHTX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.79 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 5.52 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and GCCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYHTX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.22% | -90.80% | +57.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.37% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.52% | -11.89% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -28.78% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.36% | -72.26% | +62.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -69.42% | +57.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 3.19% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) is 3.19%, while Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that FYHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYHTX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.49% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 12.31% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 14.40% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 18.45% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 19.98% | -5.52% |
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYHTX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison
FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than GCCIX's 14.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.59% | 2.93% | 3.78% | 4.10% | 57.34% | 15.05% | 0.00% | 7.00% | 12.49% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.37% | 16.09% | 4.08% | 4.20% | 10.41% | 16.46% | 0.36% | 10.81% | 1.47% | 5.88% | 0.84% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FYHTX and GCCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GCCIX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FYHTX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYHTX dropped -33.22% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.
FYHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYHTX and GCCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer