SKIRX vs. PCLPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SKIRX (DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and PCLPX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX returned 4.45%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for PCLPX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SKIRX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for PCLPX.

Performance

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKIRX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than PCLPX's 26.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX has underperformed PCLPX with an annualized return of 4.45%, while PCLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.

SKIRX

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -6.64%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 12.66%
• 1Y: 15.80%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 4.45%

PCLPX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -8.96%
• YTD: 26.13%
• 6M: 24.83%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	12.85%	11.95%	2.64%	-5.17%	8.33%	30.40%	-1.68%	2.72%	-11.57%	1.54%
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	26.13%	4.45%	5.92%	0.24%	23.04%	43.50%	-9.12%	19.39%	-12.15%	10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SKIRX and PCLPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010	0.84

The correlation between SKIRX and PCLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SKIRX vs. PCLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKIRX

SKIRX Risk / Return Rank: 16
SKIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SKIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SKIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SKIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SKIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PCLPX

PCLPX Risk / Return Rank: 28
PCLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PCLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PCLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PCLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PCLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SKIRX	PCLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.30	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.79	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.07	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	7.65	-2.70

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKIRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the PCLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKIRX and PCLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKIRX drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, which is greater than PCLPX's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKIRX and PCLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKIRX	PCLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.19%	-66.98%	-21.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-12.18%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.83%	-13.55%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.34%	-21.53%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.33%	-51.87%	+19.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.15%	-12.18%	-61.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.88%	-24.60%	-43.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.33%	-0.11%

Volatility

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) is 3.37%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that SKIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKIRX	PCLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	4.93%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	17.18%	-1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	19.42%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	19.53%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	40.61%	-27.29%

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKIRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLPX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKIRX vs. PCLPX - Dividend Comparison

SKIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than PCLPX's 11.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	11.22%	1.31%	5.22%	4.65%	43.16%	74.10%	0.71%	2.39%	18.62%	12.52%	0.15%	1.92%
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	5.88%	5.39%	3.03%	1.93%	50.74%	43.89%	1.53%	1.74%	12.16%	0.41%	7.04%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKIRX and PCLPX in my portfolio?

SKIRX and PCLPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKIRX or PCLPX?

PCLPX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to SKIRX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKIRX dropped -88.19% vs PCLPX's -66.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.