FYHTX vs. PQCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX).
FYHTX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on May 30, 2017. PQCMX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016.
Performance
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.29% | 14.72% | 4.73% | -8.62% | 15.32% | 26.43% | -3.84% | 6.91% | -11.71% | 6.00% |
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 26.66% | 13.62% | 5.09% | -8.67% | 19.10% | 27.81% | -1.13% | 8.78% | -12.07% | 7.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than PQCMX's 26.66% return.
FYHTX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 16.29%
- 6M
- 22.41%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- —
PQCMX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 6M
- 32.84%
- 1Y
- 32.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PQCMX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FYHTX vs. PQCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FYHTX
PQCMX
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYHTX | PQCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.96 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.54 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 3.64 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 9.72 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYHTX | PQCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.96 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FYHTX and PQCMX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Dividend Comparison
FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than PQCMX's 6.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.52% | 2.93% | 3.78% | 4.10% | 57.34% | 15.05% | 0.00% | 7.00% | 12.49% | 0.36% |
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 6.38% | 8.09% | 4.14% | 3.93% | 31.36% | 47.61% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 3.02% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PQCMX drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and PQCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYHTX | PQCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.22% | -33.00% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -9.32% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -26.78% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | 0.00% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -12.01% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.50% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FYHTX vs. PQCMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) is 5.38%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that FYHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FYHTX | PQCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 8.32% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 13.86% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 17.23% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 16.88% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 15.10% | -0.58% |