SKIRX vs. FCSSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SKIRX (DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and FCSSX (Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX returned 4.45%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for FCSSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SKIRX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCSSX.

Performance

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKIRX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than FCSSX's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SKIRX has underperformed FCSSX with an annualized return of 4.45%, while FCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.62% annualized return.

SKIRX

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -6.64%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 12.66%
• 1Y: 15.80%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 4.45%

FCSSX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -6.07%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 13.68%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 5.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	12.85%	11.95%	2.64%	-5.17%	8.33%	30.40%	-1.68%	2.72%	-11.57%	1.54%
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund	13.73%	15.43%	5.36%	-8.25%	18.11%	27.59%	-3.11%	7.41%	-12.10%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SKIRX and FCSSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009	0.90

The correlation between SKIRX and FCSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SKIRX vs. FCSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKIRX

SKIRX Risk / Return Rank: 16
SKIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SKIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SKIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SKIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SKIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FCSSX

FCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SKIRX	FCSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.32	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.78	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.03	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	6.09	-1.14

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKIRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FCSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKIRX and FCSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKIRX drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, which is greater than FCSSX's maximum drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKIRX and FCSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKIRX	FCSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.19%	-66.04%	-22.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-9.25%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.83%	-11.43%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.34%	-24.07%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.33%	-33.37%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.15%	-14.91%	-59.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.88%	-36.12%	-31.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.16%	+0.06%

Volatility

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (SKIRX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) at 3.20%. This indicates that SKIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKIRX	FCSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	3.20%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	11.91%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	14.25%	+3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	15.91%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	14.32%	-1.00%

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKIRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKIRX vs. FCSSX - Dividend Comparison

SKIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than FCSSX's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund	2.37%	2.69%	12.74%	4.53%	128.24%	41.74%	0.44%	1.49%	6.76%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%
SKIRX DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund	5.88%	5.39%	3.03%	1.93%	50.74%	43.89%	1.53%	1.74%	12.16%	0.41%	7.04%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKIRX and FCSSX in my portfolio?

SKIRX and FCSSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKIRX or FCSSX?

SKIRX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FCSSX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKIRX dropped -88.19% vs FCSSX's -66.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.