FCSSX vs. AAAU

In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 25.93% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSSX and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.24%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.66%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) is 4.65%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that FCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.