FCSSX vs. EAPCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX).
FCSSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 30, 2009. EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCSSX or EAPCX.
Correlation
The correlation between FCSSX and EAPCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FCSSX:
0.14
EAPCX:
0.26
FCSSX:
0.28
EAPCX:
0.41
FCSSX:
1.03
EAPCX:
1.06
FCSSX:
0.12
EAPCX:
0.20
FCSSX:
0.30
EAPCX:
0.70
FCSSX:
5.48%
EAPCX:
4.58%
FCSSX:
11.56%
EAPCX:
12.61%
FCSSX:
-66.67%
EAPCX:
-50.10%
FCSSX:
-8.91%
EAPCX:
-11.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSSX has outperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 61.07%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.00% annualized return.
FCSSX
2.20%
-2.70%
-3.01%
1.63%
93.98%
61.07%
EAPCX
3.92%
-5.87%
-4.99%
3.22%
10.13%
4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison
FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, while EAPCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 10.52% | 4.53% | 6,349.76% | 2,086.80% | 21.79% | 74.58% | 103.33% | 26.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 0.00% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 2.92% | 1.12% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.50% | 0.00% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, which is greater than EAPCX's maximum drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and EAPCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCSSX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) is 3.79%, while Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that FCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.