PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKF vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKF vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of -25.91%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.


SKF

1D
2.34%
1M
3.32%
YTD
15.68%
6M
10.42%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
-24.34%
5Y*
-15.11%
10Y*
-25.91%

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKF vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
15.68%-23.99%-36.29%-21.78%17.63%-47.66%-42.40%-42.97%16.42%-31.70%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
19.82%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SKF and SPUU is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

-0.78

The correlation between SKF and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.78 (all time) to -0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SKF vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SKF
SPUU

Financial Services

48.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

16.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

SKF
48.0%
SPUU
4.8%

Basic Materials

SKF

-

SPUU
0.7%

Communication Services

SKF

-

SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SKF

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

SKF

-

SPUU
2.0%

Energy

SKF

-

SPUU
1.4%

Healthcare

SKF

-

SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

SKF

-

SPUU
3.3%

Real Estate

SKF

-

SPUU
0.8%

Technology

SKF

-

SPUU
16.5%

Utilities

SKF

-

SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKF vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKF
SKF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKF vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKFSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.38

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

2.96

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

13.06

-12.87

SKF vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKF and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKFSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

2.26

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.61

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

0.69

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

0.63

-1.14

Drawdowns

SKF vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKFSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-59.35%

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.76%

-18.19%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.09%

-35.18%

-32.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.40%

-46.59%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.51%

-59.35%

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-1.27%

-98.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-9.51%

-79.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.13%

4.12%

+7.01%

Volatility

SKF vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKFSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.71%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.80%

18.09%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.85%

23.90%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.03%

33.46%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.90%

35.77%

+5.13%

SKF vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKF vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
4.09%5.61%7.94%3.93%0.03%0.00%0.11%1.29%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKF and SPUU have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKF has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.77% vs -25.91% for SKF. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.77% return vs -25.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.

SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.

SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.64% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKF and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer