SKE vs. CCJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SKE (Skeena Resources Ltd) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. SKE operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 5 years, SKE returned 19.08%/yr vs 40.19%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SKE vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKE achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 25.22% return.

SKE

• 1D: -5.85%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 22.71%
• 6M: 40.20%
• 1Y: 103.21%
• 3Y*: 75.47%
• 5Y*: 19.08%
• 10Y*: —

CCJ

• 1D: -4.94%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 25.22%
• 6M: 28.07%
• 1Y: 92.33%
• 3Y*: 56.47%
• 5Y*: 40.19%
• 10Y*: 26.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKE vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SKE Skeena Resources Ltd	22.71%	172.13%	78.69%	-8.27%	-48.99%	-4.14%	428.16%	134.09%	-59.87%	784.19%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	25.22%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	51.47%	-21.08%	23.58%	-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SKE and CCJ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017	0.23

The correlation between SKE and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SKE : $3.54B CCJ : $49.91B
EPS SKE : -$2.12 CCJ : $1.49
PB Ratio SKE : 19.59 CCJ : 7.05
Total Revenue (TTM) SKE : $0.00 CCJ : $3.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) SKE : -$1.29M CCJ : $1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) SKE : -$109.58M CCJ : $996.66M

Return for Risk

SKE vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKE

SKE Risk / Return Rank: 82
SKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SKE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SKE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 82
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKE vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SKE	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.69	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.48	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	3.61	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	8.18	+0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SKE vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKE and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKE	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.69	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.81	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.24	-0.04

Drawdowns

SKE vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKE drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKE and CCJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKE	CCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-87.53%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.09%	-25.69%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.55%	-40.01%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.69%	-40.01%	-35.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.61%	-14.56%	-9.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-46.10%	+11.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	11.33%	+1.09%

Volatility

SKE vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Skeena Resources Ltd (SKE) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 15.87%. This indicates that SKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKE	CCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.91%	15.87%	+2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.20%	38.06%	+5.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.79%	54.94%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.98%	49.69%	+8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	387.49%	46.60%	+340.89%

Dividends

SKE vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

SKE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.15%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%
SKE Skeena Resources Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKE and CCJ in my portfolio?

SKE and CCJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKE or CCJ?

SKE has higher volatility (17.91%) compared to CCJ (15.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKE dropped -75.69% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.