SJM vs. VRIG
SJM (The J. M. Smucker Company) is a stock, while VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, SJM returned -2.97%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SJM vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJM achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.81% return.
SJM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- -6.22%
- 3Y*
- -8.65%
- 5Y*
- -2.97%
- 10Y*
- 0.50%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SJM vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 5.73% | -7.56% | -9.61% | -17.79% | 20.06% | 21.05% | 14.50% | 14.90% | -22.58% | -0.49% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.81% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJM and VRIG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJM vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
SJM
VRIG
SJM vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SJM | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 5.38 | -4.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 62.75 | -63.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 320.64 | -321.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SJM | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 10.15 | -10.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 3.45 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.91 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
SJM vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJM drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJM and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJM | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.67% | -13.04% | -32.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.82% | -0.08% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.35% | -0.78% | -34.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -2.28% | -35.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.22% | -0.00% | -29.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -0.27% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 0.02% | +10.01% |
Volatility
SJM vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that SJM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJM | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 0.11% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | 0.36% | +17.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 0.49% | +29.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 1.29% | +22.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 3.80% | +20.51% |
Dividends
SJM vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
SJM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than VRIG's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 4.34% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SJM and VRIG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJM has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJM dropped -45.67% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.15 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJM and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer