SJCIX vs. SNTCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SJCIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund) and SNTCX (Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SJCIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SNTCX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 3 years, SJCIX returned 19.91%/yr vs 20.63%/yr for SNTCX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SJCIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for SNTCX.

Performance

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJCIX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than SNTCX's 11.27% return.

SJCIX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNTCX

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: 20.63%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund	10.10%	10.93%	23.23%	24.01%	-7.99%
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund	11.27%	33.58%	8.58%	17.60%	-8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SJCIX and SNTCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.78

The correlation between SJCIX and SNTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SJCIX vs. SNTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJCIX

SJCIX Risk / Return Rank: 39
SJCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SJCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SJCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SJCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SJCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SNTCX

SNTCX Risk / Return Rank: 47
SNTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SNTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SNTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SNTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SNTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJCIX	SNTCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.92	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.68	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	2.69	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	10.12	-0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the SNTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJCIX and SNTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJCIX	SNTCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.92	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.23	+0.53

Drawdowns

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.12%, smaller than the maximum SNTCX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCIX and SNTCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJCIX	SNTCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-60.58%	+38.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.86%	-10.60%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.47%	-15.26%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.98%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.59%	-16.09%	+10.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.82%	-0.40%

Volatility

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) is 3.06%, while Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that SJCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJCIX	SNTCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	4.94%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	12.48%	-2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	14.90%	-1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.97%	17.33%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	18.26%	-0.29%

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJCIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SNTCX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJCIX vs. SNTCX - Dividend Comparison

SJCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than SNTCX's 7.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund	5.89%	6.49%	1.42%	0.74%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund	7.07%	7.86%	18.31%	4.23%	3.17%	4.75%	3.96%	2.59%	2.47%	2.27%	2.29%	4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJCIX and SNTCX in my portfolio?

SJCIX and SNTCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJCIX or SNTCX?

SNTCX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SJCIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCIX dropped -22.12% vs SNTCX's -60.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.