PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNTCX vs. SEECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTCX achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than SEECX's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SNTCX has underperformed SEECX with an annualized return of 10.30%, while SEECX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.


SNTCX

1D
2.40%
1M
3.24%
6M
8.41%
YTD
15.30%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
5.13%

SEECX

1D
1.62%
1M
-0.61%
6M
7.44%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.47%
ALL TIME*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
15.30%33.58%8.58%17.60%-11.61%10.82%4.89%18.97%-13.17%23.33%
SEECX
Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
8.89%16.88%23.50%25.34%-19.71%30.59%12.83%29.49%-6.99%21.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTCX and SEECX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2006

0.84

The correlation between SNTCX and SEECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNTCX vs. SEECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNTCX
SNTCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SNTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SEECX
SEECX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SEECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEECX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SEECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEECX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNTCXSEECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.83

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

7.61

+3.52

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the SEECX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTCX and SEECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTCX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SEECX drawdown of -58.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTCX and SEECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNTCXSEECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-58.09%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-9.11%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-18.72%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.08%

-42.66%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-42.66%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.32%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-9.58%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.19%

+0.63%

Volatility

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund (SEECX) at 3.47%. This indicates that SNTCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNTCXSEECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.47%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

10.12%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

12.90%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

25.60%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

22.95%

-4.84%

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SEECX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNTCX vs. SEECX - Dividend Comparison

SNTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than SEECX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEECX
Crossmark Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
3.31%3.61%8.47%3.77%50.97%32.80%9.47%2.23%5.64%1.18%0.94%18.68%
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
6.82%7.86%18.31%4.23%3.17%4.75%3.96%2.59%2.47%2.27%2.29%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNTCX and SEECX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNTCX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to SEECX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTCX dropped -60.58% vs SEECX's -58.09%.

SNTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNTCX and SEECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer