SJCIX vs. SJGIX
SJCIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund) and SJGIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SJCIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SJGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 3 years, SJCIX returned 18.51%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for SJGIX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJCIX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than SJGIX's 8.27% return.
SJCIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJGIX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 19.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund | 9.44% | 10.93% | 23.23% | 24.01% | -7.99% |
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund | 8.27% | 10.22% | 30.89% | 35.65% | -11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJCIX and SJGIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SJCIX and SJGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJCIX vs. SJGIX — Risk / Return Rank
SJCIX
SJGIX
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJCIX | SJGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.55 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 5.67 | +3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.12%, smaller than the maximum SJGIX drawdown of -24.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCIX and SJGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJCIX | SJGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -24.53% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.86% | -12.41% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -22.33% | +1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.60% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -6.32% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 3.38% | -0.95% |
Volatility
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) is 4.22%, while Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund (SJGIX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SJCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJCIX | SJGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.34% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 12.73% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 15.78% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 20.50% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 20.50% | -2.55% |
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SJCIX and SJGIX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
SJCIX vs. SJGIX - Dividend Comparison
SJCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than SJGIX's 7.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund | 5.93% | 6.49% | 1.42% | 0.74% | 0.96% |
SJGIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Growth Fund | 7.98% | 8.64% | 6.72% | 0.39% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SJCIX and SJGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SJGIX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SJCIX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCIX dropped -22.12% vs SJGIX's -24.53%.
SJCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJCIX and SJGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer