SJCIX vs. SEACX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SJCIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund) and SEACX (Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SJCIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SEACX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 3 years, SJCIX returned 18.51%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for SEACX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJCIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for SEACX.

Performance

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJCIX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than SEACX's 0.06% return.

SJCIX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 22.61%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEACX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 3.82%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: 1.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund	9.44%	10.93%	23.23%	24.01%	-7.99%
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	0.06%	6.50%	1.43%	5.54%	-8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SJCIX and SEACX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.20

The correlation between SJCIX and SEACX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SJCIX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJCIX

SJCIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
SJCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SJCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SJCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
SJCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SJCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SEACX

SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 18
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SJCIX	SEACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.14	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.70	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.20	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.55	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	4.24	+4.93

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the SEACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJCIX and SEACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.12%, which is greater than SEACX's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCIX and SEACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJCIX	SEACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-16.96%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.86%	-2.66%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.47%	-3.90%	-16.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-1.45%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-2.40%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	0.97%	+1.46%

Volatility

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) at 1.09%. This indicates that SJCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJCIX	SEACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	1.09%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	2.67%	+8.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	3.63%	+9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	4.86%	+13.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	3.91%	+14.04%

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJCIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJCIX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison

SJCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than SEACX's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	3.41%	2.72%	2.78%	2.06%	1.67%	1.41%	1.86%	2.26%	2.22%	1.98%	2.18%	2.30%
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund	5.93%	6.49%	1.42%	0.74%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJCIX and SEACX in my portfolio?

SJCIX and SEACX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJCIX or SEACX?

SJCIX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to SEACX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCIX dropped -22.12% vs SEACX's -16.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.