SNTCX vs. SEACX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX).
SNTCX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2006. SEACX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004.
Performance
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | -1.29% | 33.58% | 8.58% | 17.60% | -11.61% | 10.82% | 4.89% | 18.97% | -13.17% | 23.33% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | -0.67% | 6.50% | 1.43% | 5.54% | -11.55% | -2.01% | 4.97% | 6.96% | -0.12% | 2.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNTCX achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than SEACX's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SNTCX has outperformed SEACX with an annualized return of 9.10%, while SEACX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.
SNTCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.59%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
SEACX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNTCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SNTCX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank
SNTCX
SEACX
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNTCX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.44 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.73 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 5.83 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNTCX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.05 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.30 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.66 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between SNTCX and SEACX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison
SNTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than SEACX's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNTCX Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund | 7.97% | 7.86% | 18.31% | 4.23% | 3.17% | 4.75% | 3.96% | 2.59% | 2.47% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 4.38% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | 3.36% | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 1.67% | 1.41% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 2.22% | 1.98% | 2.18% | 2.30% |
Drawdowns
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNTCX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than SEACX's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTCX and SEACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNTCX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -16.96% | -43.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.26% | -2.62% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.08% | -16.34% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -16.96% | -22.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.43% | -2.17% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -2.41% | -13.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 0.78% | +2.24% |
Volatility
SNTCX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) at 1.62%. This indicates that SNTCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SNTCX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 1.62% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 2.52% | +8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 4.11% | +13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 4.82% | +12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 3.88% | +14.33% |