SIXZ vs. QB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SIXZ (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. SIXZ is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXZ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

SIXZ vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 9.56% return.

SIXZ

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 11.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXZ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF	5.65%	4.88%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	9.56%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXZ and QB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

SIXZ vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXZ

SIXZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
SIXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SIXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SIXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SIXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SIXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

QB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXZ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXZ	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	—	—

Drawdowns

SIXZ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXZ	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.27%	-3.47%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-1.51%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-0.41%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIXZ	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.24%	6.85%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.80%	6.85%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.80%	6.85%	+0.95%

SIXZ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXZ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXZ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

SIXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.63%	0.48%
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXZ and QB in my portfolio?

SIXZ and QB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SIXZ or QB?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXZ or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXZ or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for SIXZ.

What is the main difference between SIXZ and QB?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXZ and 0.58% for QB.