SIXZ vs. PMOC
SIXZ (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF) and PMOC (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXZ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMOC.
Performance
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than PMOC's 2.77% return.
SIXZ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMOC
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF | 5.65% | 1.44% |
PMOC PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October | 2.77% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXZ and PMOC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXZ vs. PMOC — Risk / Return Rank
SIXZ
PMOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXZ | PMOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, which is greater than PMOC's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and PMOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXZ | PMOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -1.50% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.19% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -0.21% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXZ | PMOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24% | 2.40% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 2.40% | +5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 2.40% | +5.40% |
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXZ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PMOC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXZ vs. PMOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXZ nor PMOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXZ and PMOC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMOC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMOC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXZ.
SIXZ and PMOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXZ and 0.50% for PMOC.
Find the right allocation for SIXZ and PMOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer