PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXS vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 13.48% return.


SIXS

1D
0.68%
1M
1.28%
6M
13.38%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.87%

RYLD

1D
1.06%
1M
2.27%
6M
10.40%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.87M$9.43M$9.08M
$739.57K$467.06K$234.23K

SIXS vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
18.92%4.59%5.85%14.92%-18.52%40.74%44.24%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
13.48%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%33.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and RYLD is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXS and RYLD has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXS vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXS
RYLD

Financial Services

24.4%
17.8%

Healthcare

17.0%
20.3%

Utilities

11.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

8.4%
6.8%

Industrials

7.5%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
9.2%

Technology

6.3%
14.5%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.2%

Energy

2.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.4%

Financial Services

SIXS
24.4%
RYLD
17.8%

Healthcare

SIXS
17.0%
RYLD
20.3%

Utilities

SIXS
11.5%
RYLD
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SIXS
9.8%
RYLD
2.6%

Real Estate

SIXS
8.4%
RYLD
6.8%

Industrials

SIXS
7.5%
RYLD
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXS
6.6%
RYLD
9.2%

Technology

SIXS
6.3%
RYLD
14.5%

Communication Services

SIXS
5.3%
RYLD
2.2%

Energy

SIXS
2.1%
RYLD
5.5%

Basic Materials

SIXS
1.1%
RYLD
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXS vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXSRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.52

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

4.19

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.15

17.17

-4.03

SIXS vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-41.53%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.29%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-19.05%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-21.33%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-8.65%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.53%

+0.79%

Volatility

SIXS vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that SIXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXSRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.30%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

7.74%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

10.58%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

13.98%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

17.04%

+2.49%

SIXS vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXS vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than RYLD's 11.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.50%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.79%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXS and RYLD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXS has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to RYLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

On 5-year performance, SIXS leads with 6.51% vs 3.43% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXS has performed better with a 6.51% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 1.79% for SIXS.

SIXS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXS and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer