SIXO vs. QDTE
SIXO (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXO is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. SIXO is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, SIXO returned 9.31% vs 40.36% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXO charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
SIXO vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.58% return.
SIXO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXO vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF | 2.76% | 7.19% | 10.03% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.58% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXO and QDTE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SIXO and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXO vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXO
QDTE
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SIXO
QDTE
-
Financial Services
SIXO
QDTE
Communication Services
SIXO
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXO
QDTE
-
Healthcare
SIXO
QDTE
-
Industrials
SIXO
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXO
QDTE
-
Energy
SIXO
QDTE
-
Utilities
SIXO
QDTE
-
Real Estate
SIXO
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
SIXO
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXO vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
SIXO
QDTE
SIXO vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXO | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.47 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.98 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 16.08 | -7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXO | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.74 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
SIXO vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXO | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -22.86% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -10.20% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.16% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.14% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.52% | -1.43% |
Volatility
SIXO vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) is 0.64%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that SIXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXO | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 3.75% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | 11.01% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.21% | 14.81% | -9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 18.43% | -9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 18.43% | -9.35% |
SIXO vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXO vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
SIXO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 42.16% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXO and QDTE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SIXO (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 40.36% vs 9.31% for SIXO. On fees, SIXO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SIXO has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 40.36% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIXO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 0.00% for SIXO.
SIXO is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXO and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXO and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer