SIXO vs. FFEB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SIXO (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF) and FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXO is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while FFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. SIXO is passively managed, while FFEB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIXO returned 9.39%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for FFEB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXO charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FFEB.

Performance

SIXO vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's 7.48% return.

SIXO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 6M: 3.05%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 9.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 19.35%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXO vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF	3.05%	7.19%	12.22%	17.44%	-5.66%	4.16%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	7.48%	13.76%	16.64%	19.95%	-7.51%	4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and FFEB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.91

The correlation between SIXO and FFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIXO vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO

SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 56
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 84
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXO	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.69	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.86	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.54	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.39	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	17.79	-8.99

SIXO vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and FFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -23.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXO	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.04%	-23.14%	+11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-5.73%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.95%	-11.89%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.46%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-2.41%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.09%	0.00%

Volatility

SIXO vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) is 1.02%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that SIXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXO	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	2.20%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.08%	5.88%	-1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	7.25%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.04%	10.83%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.04%	13.72%	-4.68%

SIXO vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXO vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXO nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXO and FFEB in my portfolio?

SIXO and FFEB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXO or FFEB?

FFEB has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to SIXO (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs FFEB's -23.14%.

Which ETF is better, SIXO or FFEB?

On 3-year performance, FFEB leads with 15.80% vs 9.39% for SIXO. On fees, SIXO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SIXO has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXO or FFEB?

Over the 3-year period, FFEB has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXO or FFEB?

SIXO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXO or FFEB?

SIXO and FFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXO and FFEB?

SIXO is categorized as Options Trading, while FFEB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXO and 0.85% for FFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.