SIXO vs. AIOO
SIXO (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXO is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while AIOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz. SIXO is passively managed, while AIOO is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXO charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
SIXO vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.34% return.
SIXO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXO vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXO AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF | 2.76% | 4.85% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.34% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXO and AIOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXO vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
SIXO
AIOO
SIXO vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXO | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXO | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 2.79 | -1.92 |
Drawdowns
SIXO vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXO | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -0.74% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.13% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -0.17% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXO vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXO | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.21% | 1.99% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 1.99% | +7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 1.99% | +7.09% |
SIXO vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXO vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXO nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXO and AIOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXO.
SIXO and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SIXO is categorized as Options Trading, while AIOO is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXO and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for SIXO and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer