SIXL vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. SIXL is actively managed, while NUKZ is passively managed. Over the past year, SIXL returned 3.64% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXL charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXL achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 13.31% return.

SIXL

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	3.41%	-0.61%	14.60%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	13.31%	56.57%	62.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXL and NUKZ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.25

The correlation between SIXL and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXL	NUKZ
Utilities	17.3%	35.8%
Consumer Defensive	17.0%	-
Financial Services	15.2%	-
Healthcare	14.5%	-
Real Estate	13.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	-
Industrials	6.4%	45.9%
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Technology	2.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	4.0%
Energy	2.1%	12.9%

Return for Risk

SIXL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 15
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXL	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.40	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.02	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.23	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	2.52	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.58	6.34	-4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXL and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXL	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	1.40	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.75	-1.13

Drawdowns

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXL drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXL and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXL	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-33.03%	+16.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.52%	-16.51%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.04%	-5.61%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-6.01%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	6.55%	-4.24%

Volatility

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) is 2.36%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that SIXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXL	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	10.30%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	22.05%	-15.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	29.74%	-20.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.14%	32.70%	-20.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.55%	32.70%	-20.15%

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXL has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than NUKZ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.31%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXL and NUKZ in my portfolio?

SIXL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXL or NUKZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to SIXL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXL dropped -16.08% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, SIXL or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 41.42% vs 3.64% for SIXL. On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXL or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 41.42% return vs 3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXL or NUKZ?

SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXL or NUKZ?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.80% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between SIXL and NUKZ?

SIXL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SIXL and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.