SIXL vs. OPTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SIXL is actively managed, while OPTZ is passively managed. Over the past year, SIXL returned 14.10% vs 43.75% for OPTZ. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SIXL charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.

Performance

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXL achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 24.46% return.

SIXL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 6.85%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 9.10%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

OPTZ

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: 20.35%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	$154.33K	$341.82K	$247.38K
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	$85.49K	$51.42K	$104.59K

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	11.76%	-0.61%	12.31%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	24.46%	22.83%	16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXL and OPTZ is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXL and OPTZ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXL	OPTZ
Utilities	17.0%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	16.4%	3.6%
Healthcare	15.7%	9.7%
Financial Services	15.7%	7.8%
Real Estate	13.3%	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	8.1%
Industrials	6.3%	7.9%
Communication Services	2.5%	2.4%
Technology	2.4%	56.6%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.0%
Energy	2.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

SIXL vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 55
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 49

OPTZ

OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 81
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXL	OPTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.88	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.56	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.09	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.72	12.07	-6.35

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXL and OPTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXL drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum OPTZ drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXL and OPTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXL	OPTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-25.75%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.52%	-13.39%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-9.85%	+7.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-3.51%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	3.42%	-1.01%

Volatility

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) is 4.24%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that SIXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXL	OPTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	8.76%	-4.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	18.77%	-10.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	21.97%	-11.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.31%	21.88%	-9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.60%	21.88%	-9.28%

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXL has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXL vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than OPTZ's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.19%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXL and OPTZ in my portfolio?

SIXL and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXL or OPTZ?

OPTZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to SIXL (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXL dropped -16.08% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.

Which ETF is better, SIXL or OPTZ?

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 43.75% vs 14.10% for SIXL. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXL or OPTZ?

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 43.75% return vs 14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXL or OPTZ?

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXL or OPTZ?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.47% for OPTZ.

What is the main difference between SIXL and OPTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SIXL and 0.25% for OPTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.