SIXJ vs. DJP

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) and DJP (iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXJ is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while DJP is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIXJ returned 13.85%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for DJP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXJ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DJP.

Performance

SIXJ vs. DJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 19.91% return.

SIXJ

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.42%
• 6M: 6.25%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 1Y: 14.28%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DJP

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: 16.75%
• YTD: 19.91%
• 1Y: 29.52%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: 6.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXJ vs. DJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	7.12%	12.81%	14.48%	18.07%	-10.33%
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN	19.91%	17.20%	5.59%	-9.85%	17.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and DJP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.16

The correlation between SIXJ and DJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. DJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DJP

DJP Risk / Return Rank: 53
DJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
DJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DJP Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DJP Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXJ	DJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.59	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	2.12	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.29	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	1.88	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.90	6.29	+10.61

SIXJ vs. DJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the DJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and DJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and DJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXJ	DJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-78.35%	+64.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-16.42%	+11.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.89%	-16.42%	+5.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-38.33%	+38.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-50.79%	+47.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	4.89%	-4.06%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is 1.59%, while iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that SIXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXJ	DJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.59%	4.94%	-3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.86%	16.79%	-11.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.69%	19.32%	-13.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.94%	18.98%	-9.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.94%	17.04%	-7.10%

SIXJ vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXJ vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXJ nor DJP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXJ and DJP in my portfolio?

SIXJ and DJP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXJ or DJP?

DJP has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SIXJ (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXJ dropped -14.07% vs DJP's -78.35%.

Which ETF is better, SIXJ or DJP?

On 3-year performance, SIXJ leads with 13.85% vs 13.06% for DJP. On fees, DJP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXJ or DJP?

Over the 3-year period, SIXJ has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 13.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXJ or DJP?

DJP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXJ or DJP?

SIXJ and DJP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXJ and DJP?

SIXJ is categorized as Options Trading, while DJP is Commodities. SIXJ tracks S&P 500, while DJP tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXJ and 0.70% for DJP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.