PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXJ vs. SIXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
-1.87%12.81%14.48%18.07%-10.71%
SIXO
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
-2.74%7.19%12.22%17.44%-5.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXJ achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly higher than SIXO's -2.74% return.


SIXJ

1D
1.64%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-1.87%
6M
0.90%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
10Y*

SIXO

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXJ vs. SIXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXJ and SIXO have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

SIXJ vs. SIXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXJ
SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXJSIXODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

0.71

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.09

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.93

+0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

4.89

+4.84

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the SIXO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXJ and SIXO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXJSIXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.71

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SIXJ and SIXO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXJ nor SIXO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXJ drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than SIXO's maximum drawdown of -12.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXJ and SIXO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXJSIXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-12.04%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-7.49%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-4.09%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.07%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.42%

-0.13%

Volatility

SIXJ vs. SIXO - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) at 1.81%. This indicates that SIXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXJSIXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

1.81%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

4.68%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

9.83%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.17%

9.21%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

9.21%

+0.96%