PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. QLVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 18.06% return.


SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%24.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and QLVE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXH and QLVE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXH vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXH
QLVE

Consumer Defensive

23.2%
10.8%

Technology

20.2%
59.6%

Communication Services

13.3%
18.4%

Healthcare

12.6%
7.6%

Financial Services

9.7%
38.5%

Industrials

7.8%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
10.4%

Utilities

5.0%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.1%

Energy

0.1%
7.2%

Basic Materials

0.1%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

SIXH
23.2%
QLVE
10.8%

Technology

SIXH
20.2%
QLVE
59.6%

Communication Services

SIXH
13.3%
QLVE
18.4%

Healthcare

SIXH
12.6%
QLVE
7.6%

Financial Services

SIXH
9.7%
QLVE
38.5%

Industrials

SIXH
7.8%
QLVE
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXH
6.8%
QLVE
10.4%

Utilities

SIXH
5.0%
QLVE
5.4%

Real Estate

SIXH
1.4%
QLVE
0.1%

Energy

SIXH
0.1%
QLVE
7.2%

Basic Materials

SIXH
0.1%
QLVE
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXHQLVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.98

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

11.97

-5.72

SIXH vs. QLVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the QLVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and QLVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXHQLVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.10

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.55

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.48

+0.58

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum QLVE drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and QLVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHQLVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-29.96%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-11.60%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-13.29%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-23.94%

+12.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-1.29%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-8.29%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.88%

-1.18%

Volatility

SIXH vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.31%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHQLVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

6.82%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

14.82%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

16.46%

-8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

13.48%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

15.79%

-5.64%

SIXH vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QLVE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than QLVE's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and QLVE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs QLVE's -29.96%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and QLVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer