SIXH vs. QLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. SIXH is actively managed, while QLV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXH returned 8.95%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for QLV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXH charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.

Performance

SIXH vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 5.48% return.

SIXH

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 10.61%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

QLV

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 5.38%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF	7.20%	9.47%	12.06%	4.93%	6.90%	18.37%	5.83%
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	5.48%	12.28%	18.08%	13.71%	-9.97%	26.08%	21.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and QLV is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020	0.55

The correlation between SIXH and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXH vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXH	QLV
Consumer Defensive	23.2%	8.5%
Technology	20.2%	28.6%
Communication Services	13.3%	8.4%
Healthcare	12.6%	12.7%
Financial Services	9.7%	12.3%
Industrials	7.8%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	6.8%
Utilities	5.0%	6.5%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.7%
Energy	0.1%	5.8%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

SIXH vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH

SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 42
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QLV

QLV Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIXH	QLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.85	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.68	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.28	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	9.69	-3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIXH vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXH	QLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.85	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.85	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.69	+0.36

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and QLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXH	QLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.68%	-33.71%	+22.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.36%	-6.19%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.10%	-12.05%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.68%	-17.93%	+6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.81%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-4.00%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	1.45%	+0.25%

Volatility

SIXH vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 1.61%. This indicates that SIXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXH	QLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	1.61%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.02%	5.34%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.60%	7.65%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	12.64%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	16.57%	-6.42%

SIXH vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXH vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	1.52%	1.60%	1.66%	1.60%	1.74%	0.96%	1.24%	0.58%
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF	1.90%	2.23%	1.55%	2.04%	2.06%	1.65%	1.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXH and QLV in my portfolio?

SIXH and QLV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXH or QLV?

SIXH has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs QLV's -33.71%.

Which ETF is better, SIXH or QLV?

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXH or QLV?

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXH or QLV?

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXH or QLV?

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

What is the main difference between SIXH and QLV?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.22% for QLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.