PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. AIVC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 49.41% return.


SIXH

1D
1.18%
1M
1.53%
6M
9.30%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*

AIVC

1D
-4.19%
1M
-11.73%
6M
43.18%
YTD
49.41%
1Y
87.08%
3Y*
39.34%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
11.59%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
49.41%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%56.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and AIVC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.13

The correlation between SIXH and AIVC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXHAIVCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

4.90

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

16.15

-7.19

SIXH vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and AIVC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHAIVCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-56.11%

+44.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-17.85%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-32.55%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-53.58%

+41.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.85%

+17.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-16.35%

+14.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

5.41%

-3.69%

Volatility

SIXH vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.30%, while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHAIVCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

12.82%

-10.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.29%

28.76%

-22.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

33.92%

-26.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

31.10%

-20.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.11%

27.33%

-17.22%

SIXH vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than AIVC's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.11%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.85%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and AIVC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVC has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to SIXH (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

On 5-year performance, AIVC leads with 15.33% vs 9.77% for SIXH. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 15.33% return vs 9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

SIXH is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.59% for AIVC.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and AIVC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer