PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.


SIXH

1D
0.45%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.25%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
10.10%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and ^GSPC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXH and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXH^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.46

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

10.92

-3.07

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXH^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-56.78%

+45.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-9.10%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-18.90%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-25.43%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-3.21%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-10.71%

+8.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.04%

-0.32%

Volatility

SIXH vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.29%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXH^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

4.89%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

9.93%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

12.57%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

17.00%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.12%

18.08%

-7.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SIXH (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer