PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


SIXD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and UXJL is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

1.87

+0.33

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-10.29%

+5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.76%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-1.51%

+0.73%

Volatility

SIXD vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

13.90%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.36%

13.90%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

13.90%

-6.54%

SIXD vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXD vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SIXD and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SIXD is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

SIXD and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer