SIXD vs. JULB
SIXD (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SIXD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
SIXD vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
SIXD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXD vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 6.99% | -0.18% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXD and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXD vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXD | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.20 | 2.17 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SIXD vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXD | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -5.24% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.07% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -0.87% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SIXD vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXD | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.36% | 6.81% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 6.81% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.36% | 6.81% | +0.55% |
SIXD vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXD vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXD nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SIXD and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXD.
SIXD and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for SIXD and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer