SIXD vs. JANB
SIXD (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
SIXD vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.32% return.
SIXD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXD vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXD AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF | 7.20% | -0.18% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.32% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXD and JANB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXD vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXD | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.29 | 2.03 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SIXD vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXD | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -6.52% | +1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -1.15% | +0.36% |
Volatility
SIXD vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXD | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 7.43% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.38% | 7.43% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.38% | 7.43% | -0.05% |
SIXD vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXD vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXD nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SIXD and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SIXD.
SIXD and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for SIXD and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer