SIVR vs. SGOL
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL).
SIVR and SGOL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. SGOL is a passively managed fund by abrdn that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009. Both SIVR and SGOL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIVR vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIVR vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 5.81% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 10.52% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than SGOL's 10.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed SGOL with an annualized return of 17.10%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -16.47%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 58.90%
- 1Y
- 123.03%
- 3Y*
- 45.76%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
SGOL
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 23.14%
- 1Y
- 52.61%
- 3Y*
- 34.00%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
SGOL
SIVR vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.92 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.35 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.73 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 10.00 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.92 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.27 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.91 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and SGOL is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIVR vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor SGOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SGOL's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SGOL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -45.51% | -30.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -19.14% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -20.92% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -21.56% | -20.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.45% | -11.69% | -23.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -18.46% | -29.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.75% | 5.22% | +8.53% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) at 10.39%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.98% | 10.39% | +6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.26% | 24.05% | +33.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.02% | 27.52% | +29.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.30% | 17.64% | +17.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 15.84% | +15.55% |