SIVR vs. SCHF
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.22%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for SCHF. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
SIVR vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 14.22%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -18.81%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 86.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
SIVR vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and SCHF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SIVR and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
SCHF
SIVR vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.64 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 10.14 | -6.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -34.87% | -40.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -11.48% | -33.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -13.41% | -31.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -29.14% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | -34.87% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -1.00% | -40.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -7.37% | -40.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 2.99% | +17.86% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 6.91%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 6.91% | +9.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 14.42% | +44.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 16.67% | +43.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 16.56% | +19.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 17.24% | +14.79% |
SIVR vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and SCHF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to SCHF (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 14.22% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer