SIVR vs. AUMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI).
SIVR and AUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. Both SIVR and AUMI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIVR vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIVR vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 5.81% | 145.34% | 21.08% | 0.09% |
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 10.53% | 164.18% | 30.61% | 4.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than AUMI's 10.53% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -16.47%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 58.90%
- 1Y
- 123.03%
- 3Y*
- 45.76%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
AUMI
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -16.46%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- 1Y
- 116.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
AUMI
SIVR vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 2.35 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.57 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.66 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 12.93 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.35 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 2.01 | -1.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and AUMI is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SIVR vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than AUMI's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and AUMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -31.88% | -43.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -31.88% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.45% | -16.84% | -18.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -6.00% | -41.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.75% | 9.03% | +4.72% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 16.98%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | AUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.98% | 18.77% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.26% | 40.65% | +16.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.02% | 49.65% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.30% | 41.38% | -6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 41.38% | -9.99% |