SITM vs. LRCX
SITM (SiTime Corporation) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SITM in Semiconductors, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 5 years, SITM returned 31.59%/yr vs 37.09%/yr for LRCX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SITM vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SITM achieves a 51.53% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 71.50% return.
SITM
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -23.96%
- 6M
- 47.39%
- YTD
- 51.53%
- 1Y
- 163.84%
- 3Y*
- 58.81%
- 5Y*
- 31.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 74.26%
LRCX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -25.11%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 210.67%
- 3Y*
- 61.40%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 43.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.65B | $3.82B | $3.92B | |
| $238.88M | $264.90M | $400.80M |
SITM vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime Corporation | 51.53% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 71.50% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 6.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SITM and LRCX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SITM and LRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SITM:
$14.13B
LRCX:
$366.44B
SITM:
-$0.92
LRCX:
$5.75
SITM:
37.22
LRCX:
15.93
SITM:
12.16
LRCX:
29.63
SITM:
$379.91M
LRCX:
$23.23B
SITM:
$211.60M
LRCX:
$11.73B
SITM:
-$13.71M
LRCX:
$8.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SITM vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
SITM
LRCX
SITM vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SITM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 5.08 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 21.44 | -11.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SITM vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SITM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.12% | -87.90% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.73% | -41.76% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.26% | -47.10% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | -56.39% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.63% | -32.38% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -28.13% | -8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.24% | 9.87% | +6.37% |
Volatility
SITM vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) have volatilities of 27.75% and 27.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SITM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.75% | 27.34% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.42% | 52.39% | +10.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.71% | 63.10% | +17.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.22% | 48.97% | +28.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.69% | 46.20% | +34.49% |
Dividends
SITM vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SITM vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiTime Corporation and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SITM vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SITM and LRCX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (27.75%) compared to LRCX (27.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITM dropped -78.12% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SITM and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer