SITM vs. LASR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SiTime Corporation (SITM) and nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR).

Performance

SITM vs. LASR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SiTime Corporation (SITM) and nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SITM vs. LASR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SITM SiTime Corporation	-2.22%	64.63%	75.73%	20.13%	-65.26%	161.36%	338.94%	96.15%
LASR nLIGHT, Inc.	52.01%	257.58%	-22.30%	33.14%	-57.66%	-26.65%	61.00%	1.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SITM : $9.35B LASR : $2.90B
EPS SITM : -$1.67 LASR : -$0.47
PS Ratio SITM : 27.08 LASR : 10.92
PB Ratio SITM : 8.09 LASR : 12.81
Total Revenue (TTM) SITM : $326.66M LASR : $261.33M
Gross Profit (TTM) SITM : $174.99M LASR : $77.96M
EBITDA (TTM) SITM : -$26.67M LASR : -$28.35M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SITM achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than LASR's 52.01% return.

SITM

• 1D: 10.96%
• 1M: -13.20%
• YTD: -2.22%
• 6M: 14.62%
• 1Y: 125.91%
• 3Y*: 34.41%
• 5Y*: 26.81%
• 10Y*: —

LASR

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 52.01%
• 6M: 92.44%
• 1Y: 633.85%
• 3Y*: 77.59%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SITM vs. LASR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SITM

SITM Risk / Return Rank: 87
SITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SITM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SITM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LASR

LASR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LASR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
LASR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SITM vs. LASR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SITM	LASR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	7.60	-5.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	5.18	-2.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.69	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	24.95	-20.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.77	97.67	-86.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SITM vs. LASR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SITM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the LASR Sharpe Ratio of 7.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SITM and LASR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SITM	LASR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	7.60	-5.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.18	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.15	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between SITM and LASR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SITM vs. LASR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SITM nor LASR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SITM vs. LASR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, smaller than the maximum LASR drawdown of -85.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and LASR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SITM	LASR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.12%	-85.66%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.39%	-24.74%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.12%	-82.47%	+4.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.65%	-20.53%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.58%	-53.77%	+16.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.76%	6.32%	+5.44%

Volatility

SITM vs. LASR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SiTime Corporation (SITM) is 26.66%, while nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) has a volatility of 31.42%. This indicates that SITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LASR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SITM	LASR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.66%	31.42%	-4.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.10%	57.76%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.62%	84.25%	-5.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.29%	63.83%	+11.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.13%	65.87%	+14.26%

Financials

SITM vs. LASR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SiTime Corporation and nLIGHT, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SITM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 63.88M and revenue of 113.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.

LASR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.95M and revenue of 81.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.7%.

SITM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of 1.76M and revenue of 113.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

LASR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.41M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.

SITM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of 9.17M and revenue of 113.28M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

LASR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a net income of -4.91M and revenue of 81.19M, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.