SITM vs. LQDA
SITM (SiTime Corporation) and LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) are both stocks. SITM operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, SITM returned 45.36%/yr vs 92.14%/yr for LQDA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SITM vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SITM having a 106.66% return and LQDA slightly lower at 106.52%.
SITM
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -12.62%
- YTD
- 106.66%
- 6M
- 101.60%
- 1Y
- 240.91%
- 3Y*
- 84.61%
- 5Y*
- 45.36%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 23.68%
- YTD
- 106.52%
- 6M
- 113.39%
- 1Y
- 392.94%
- 3Y*
- 105.40%
- 5Y*
- 92.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SITM vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime Corporation | 106.66% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 106.52% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SITM and LQDA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SITM and LQDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SITM:
$19.23B
LQDA:
$7.20B
SITM:
-$0.94
LQDA:
$0.24
SITM:
49.56
LQDA:
23.06
SITM:
16.59
LQDA:
66.33
SITM:
$379.91M
LQDA:
$288.07M
SITM:
$211.60M
LQDA:
$275.77M
SITM:
-$13.71M
LQDA:
$51.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SITM vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank
SITM
LQDA
SITM vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SITM | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.61 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 11.11 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.89 | 28.59 | -9.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SITM vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, smaller than the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and LQDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SITM | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.12% | -93.87% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.59% | -35.66% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.26% | -46.80% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | -55.36% | -22.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.03% | -0.55% | -18.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -69.53% | +32.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.81% | 13.91% | -1.10% |
Volatility
SITM vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison
SiTime Corporation (SITM) has a higher volatility of 21.66% compared to Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) at 19.43%. This indicates that SITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SITM | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.66% | 19.43% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.40% | 48.44% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.77% | 65.96% | +10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.35% | 73.71% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.51% | 85.80% | -5.29% |
Dividends
SITM vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SITM nor LQDA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SITM vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiTime Corporation and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SITM vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SITM and LQDA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (21.66%) compared to LQDA (19.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITM dropped -78.12% vs LQDA's -93.87%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.01 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SITM and LQDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer