PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SITIY vs. DHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SITIY vs. DHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SITC International Holdings Company Limited (SITIY) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SITIY achieves a 23.94% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's 44.86% return.


SITIY

1D
3.13%
1M
7.09%
YTD
23.94%
6M
41.90%
1Y
62.12%
3Y*
54.02%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*

DHT

1D
2.52%
1M
-8.91%
YTD
44.86%
6M
38.62%
1Y
58.35%
3Y*
40.64%
5Y*
30.96%
10Y*
20.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SITIY vs. DHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SITIY
SITC International Holdings Company Limited
23.94%81.12%51.25%-7.99%-31.05%103.40%80.77%29.84%2.79%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
44.86%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%-3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SITIY and DHT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2018

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SITIY:

$12.28B

DHT:

$2.68B

EPS

SITIY:

$6.44

DHT:

$2.06

PE Ratio

SITIY:

7.06

DHT:

8.08

PEG Ratio

SITIY:

0.27

DHT:

0.27

PS Ratio

SITIY:

2.48

DHT:

4.73

PB Ratio

SITIY:

4.95

DHT:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

SITIY:

$4.94B

DHT:

$566.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SITIY:

$1.88B

DHT:

$268.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

SITIY:

$1.86B

DHT:

$450.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SITIY vs. DHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SITIY
SITIY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SITIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SITIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SITIY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SITIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SITIY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SITIY vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SITC International Holdings Company Limited (SITIY) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SITIYDHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.85

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

8.14

+0.11

SITIY vs. DHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SITIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SITIY and DHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SITIYDHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.74

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.81

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.05

+0.28

Drawdowns

SITIY vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SITIY drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITIY and DHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SITIYDHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.72%

-97.12%

+34.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.06%

-15.22%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-24.96%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.03%

-34.44%

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-66.56%

+64.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-76.38%

+54.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

7.19%

+0.36%

Volatility

SITIY vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison

SITC International Holdings Company Limited (SITIY) has a higher volatility of 18.68% compared to DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) at 9.32%. This indicates that SITIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SITIYDHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.68%

9.32%

+9.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.51%

26.96%

+16.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.54%

33.72%

+27.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.82%

38.25%

+32.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

176.74%

41.58%

+135.16%

Dividends

SITIY vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison

SITIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, less than DHT's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
8.83%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%
SITIY
SITC International Holdings Company Limited
8.44%8.90%8.57%15.93%22.14%8.25%4.68%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SITIY vs. DHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SITC International Holdings Company Limited and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B202120222023202420252026
1.75B
186.48M
(SITIY) Total Revenue
(DHT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SITIY vs. DHT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SITC International Holdings Company Limited and DHT Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
36.5%
60.4%
Portfolio components
SITIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SITC International Holdings Company Limited reported a gross profit of 637.93M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

SITIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SITC International Holdings Company Limited reported an operating income of 555.17M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.8%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

SITIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SITC International Holdings Company Limited reported a net income of 592.89M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SITIY and DHT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SITIY has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to DHT (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITIY dropped -62.72% vs DHT's -97.12%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SITIY and DHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer