SIOO vs. QRMI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).

SIOO and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIOO is a passively managed fund by VistaShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 100. It was launched on Dec 10, 2025. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

SIOO vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIOO vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	-3.21%	0.77%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	1.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -2.50% return.

SIOO

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: -3.21%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

SIOO

VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF

Return for Risk

SIOO vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIOO vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIOO	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	0.09	-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and QRMI is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SIOO vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than QRMI's 12.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	5.30%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIOO	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-20.95%	+14.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-3.54%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-8.25%	+6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIOO	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.51%	7.77%	+3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	8.46%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.51%	8.46%	+3.05%