SIMS vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIMS is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. SIMS is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIMS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

SIMS vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

SIMS

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -2.46%
• 6M: 1.53%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 1Y: 23.32%
• 3Y*: 7.94%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	7.39%	-10.24%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and POW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

SIMS vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS

SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 33
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIMS	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.80	—	—

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIMS	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-18.37%	-25.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.71%	-18.37%	+12.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-4.33%	-11.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIMS	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.34%	32.94%	-8.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.32%	32.94%	-7.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.03%	32.94%	-6.91%

SIMS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIMS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	0.56%	0.66%	0.88%	1.49%	1.48%	0.97%	0.58%	1.24%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIMS and POW in my portfolio?

SIMS and POW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SIMS or POW?

On fees, SIMS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIMS or POW?

SIMS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIMS or POW?

SIMS has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between SIMS and POW?

SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.75% for POW.