PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIMS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIMS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


SIMS

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.83%
YTD
13.06%
6M
9.06%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
13.06%23.75%-0.27%7.43%-27.13%9.00%29.88%35.30%-18.07%0.03%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and QQQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.68

The correlation between SIMS and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIMS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIMS
QQQ

Industrials

51.4%
2.8%

Technology

22.2%
53.8%

Energy

11.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

5.5%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
12.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.1%

Utilities

3.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Industrials

SIMS
51.4%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

SIMS
22.2%
QQQ
53.8%

Energy

SIMS
11.0%
QQQ
0.6%

Communication Services

SIMS
5.5%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SIMS
3.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

SIMS
3.3%
QQQ
1.1%

Utilities

SIMS
3.2%
QQQ
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

SIMS

-

QQQ
7.7%

Financial Services

SIMS

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

SIMS

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

SIMS

-

QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIMS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS
SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIMSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.51

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

13.49

-6.84

SIMS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIMSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.64

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.81

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.41

-0.16

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIMSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-82.97%

+39.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-11.96%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.78%

-22.77%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-35.12%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.26%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-32.79%

+16.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

3.11%

+2.92%

Volatility

SIMS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIMSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.49%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

12.10%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

15.94%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

22.38%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

22.29%

+3.73%

SIMS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIMS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
0.57%0.66%0.88%1.49%1.48%0.97%0.58%1.24%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIMS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIMS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 0.71% for SIMS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

SIMS has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIMS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer