SIMS vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
SIMS and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIMS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both SIMS and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIMS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIMS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 0.39% | 23.75% | -0.27% | 7.43% | -27.13% | 9.00% | 29.88% | 35.30% | -18.07% | 0.03% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | -0.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return.
SIMS
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIMS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIMS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SIMS
QQQ
SIMS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIMS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.63 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.88 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 6.95 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIMS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.58 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.37 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMS and QQQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SIMS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.58% | 1.24% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
SIMS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -82.97% | +39.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.79% | -12.62% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.97% | -35.12% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.64% | -8.98% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -32.99% | +16.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.14% | 3.41% | +2.73% |
Volatility
SIMS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIMS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 6.51% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | 12.77% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 22.67% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 22.39% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.17% | 22.25% | +3.92% |