PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIMS vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIMS vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than GII's 7.74% return.


SIMS

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.83%
YTD
13.06%
6M
9.06%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*

GII

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.63%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
13.06%23.75%-0.27%7.43%-27.13%9.00%29.88%35.30%-18.07%0.03%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
7.74%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and GII is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.59

The correlation between SIMS and GII shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIMS vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIMS
GII

Industrials

51.4%
27.1%

Technology

22.2%
2.5%

Energy

11.0%
21.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Utilities

3.2%
26.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Industrials

SIMS
51.4%
GII
27.1%

Technology

SIMS
22.2%
GII
2.5%

Energy

SIMS
11.0%
GII
21.5%

Communication Services

SIMS
5.5%
GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SIMS
3.4%
GII

-

Basic Materials

SIMS
3.3%
GII

-

Utilities

SIMS
3.2%
GII
26.5%

Consumer Defensive

SIMS

-

GII

-

Financial Services

SIMS

-

GII
4.5%

Healthcare

SIMS

-

GII

-

Real Estate

SIMS

-

GII
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIMS vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS
SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIMSGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.53

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

7.88

-1.23

SIMS vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIMSGIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.40

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.72

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.28

-0.03

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, smaller than the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIMSGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-50.98%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-5.94%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.78%

-14.31%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-20.67%

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-4.55%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-11.52%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

1.90%

+4.13%

Volatility

SIMS vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 3.85%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIMSGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.85%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

8.79%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

10.74%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

14.11%

+10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

17.14%

+8.88%

SIMS vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIMS vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than GII's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.72%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
0.57%0.66%0.88%1.49%1.48%0.97%0.58%1.24%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIMS and GII have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIMS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to GII (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 5-year performance, GII leads with 10.11% vs 0.71% for SIMS. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GII has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.57% for SIMS.

SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while GII is Utilities Equities. SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.40% for GII.

SIMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIMS and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer