SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both Silver funds - SILJ tracks the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index while SVR-C.TO tracks the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 6.55%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SILJ is traded in USD, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -6.32% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 6.55%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -6.32%
- 6M
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- 78.43%
- 3Y*
- 44.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -21.81%
- YTD
- -17.45%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 36.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -6.32% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -17.45% | 144.05% | 20.41% | -0.28% | 3.15% | -12.98% | 47.38% | 13.97% | -9.93% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and SVR-C.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, SILJ and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
SVR-C.TO
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.26 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 2.76 | +1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -67.24% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | -51.08% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -51.08% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.81% | -51.08% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -51.08% | -18.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.68% | -49.32% | +13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -40.00% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | 23.18% | -6.51% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 20.11% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) at 15.47%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.11% | 15.47% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.09% | 56.85% | -8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.53% | 59.24% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 36.71% | +8.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.43% | 32.53% | +13.90% |
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while SVR-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.14% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SVR-C.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SVR-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer